Public Health Research & Practice takes its publishing responsibilities seriously, is committed to the highest standards of editorial integrity and abides by the Principles of Transparency and best Practice in Scholarly Publishing issued by the Committee on Publication Ethics and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals.
Authors submitting work to Public Health Research & Practice should meet all four authorship criteria established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE):
A short statement outlining each author’s contribution must be submitted with each manuscript and can be uploaded via our online journal management system ScholarOne. An example is below:
AB was responsible for the design, drafting, analysis of data, and editing of the manuscript.
CD was responsible for the design, drafting and editing of the manuscript
EF was responsible for reviewing and editing the manuscript and overseeing the data analysis.
GH was responsible for the reviewing and editing the manuscript.
IJ was responsible for providing analytical advice, reviewing and editing the manuscript.
KL was responsible for the reviewing and editing the manuscript and contributing to the design of the manuscript.
Decisions on authorship and the order of authorship are the responsibility of the authors and should be resolved prior to manuscript submission. Those who have contributed to the manuscript (either individuals or organisations) but who do not meet all of the authorship criteria should be listed in the paper’s Acknowledgements and the authors should seek their permission to do so.
Ideally, there should be an upper limit of six authors per manuscript.
The Corresponding Author takes sole responsibility for all communications with the journal. This includes managing communications between authors and ensuring the accuracy of all content provided to the journal, such as article proofs, journal forms, submitting the authorship statement and each author’s Conflict of Interests Declaration (see below)
Requests to remove or add authors after manuscript submission or publication must be accompanied by signed agreement from all authors before Public Health Research & Practice will act.
Authors should be familiar with:
The journal uses a system of single-blind peer review, where reviewers’ details are kept confidential and authors’ details are attached to their manuscript.
We engage the services of peer reviewers to assess all original research, systematic reviews and research methods articles, Perspectives pieces, In Practice articles and Brief reports
In each case, two reviewer opinions are sought, however in some cases, a third reviewer may be consulted. The editorial team may also consider a paper could benefit from the insights of a statistical reviewer, in which case we will seek this advice. In each case the journal Associate Editor responsible for the manuscript will make a recommendation on publication to the Editor-in-Chief based on the content of the reviews and their own input. The Editor-in-Chief then makes the final decision on whether to publish.
Public Health Research & Practice asks reviewers to abide by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. For more detailed information on the peer review process, visit For peer reviewers and download our Peer review guidelines.
In the interests of transparency, each author is required to sign the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Conflicts of Interest Declaration. Conflicts may be financial or non-financial. The corresponding author should also include a summary statement on conflicts of interest. This will be published with the article. If there are no conflicts to declare, this will be stated on the article. Articles will not be published unless conflict of interest forms have been received. These can be downloaded from the Submit a paper section or via ScholarOne when you log in to submit your manuscript.
As part of the peer review process we also ask reviewers to declare any competing interests. In doing so we would ask them to consider the following:
Editors and reviewers will treat all manuscripts submitted to Public Health Research & Practice as confidential and no manuscripts will be shared with third parties except in cases of suspected misconduct. Manuscripts may be shared internally with Editorial Board members, Associate Editors and other editors at the journal as part of our editorial and production processes. Rejected manuscripts will not be kept on file and will be deleted after rejection.
The journal will not disclose the identity of peer reviewers. An exception may be made in cases of suspected misconduct. Reviewers should not disclose their identity without first consulting the journal and should refer to the Guidelines for reviewers for more detailed requirements on manuscript confidentiality.
Public Health Research & Practice does not accept manuscripts that have been simultaneously sent to other journals or previously published elsewhere. The exception to this is published research abstracts that have been presented at conferences. Media reports of conference presentations will therefore not impede consideration – as long as they do not include further data not presented at the conference. However, authors should notify the journal Editor of any dissemination, including media coverage, which has taken place in relation to the paper
Published or in-press articles based on the same research data as a manuscript submitted to the journal must be disclosed and a copy supplied as a supplementary file with the manuscript.
Manuscripts accepted for publication are embargoed until they are uploaded to the Public Health Research & Practice website. Authors will be notified in advance about the publication date and time, to allow them to discuss their work with journalists who agree to abide by the journal embargo policy. Authors might also prepare blogs and comment pieces for other sites/publications about their work ahead of time, as long as these are not published before the journal embargo is lifted.
The journal’s Editor will select manuscripts from each issue considered suitable for highlighting to the media, will work with authors on media release content and send them a final version for approval. Authors whose papers are released to the media are obliged to make themselves or a suitable representative available for interview. Media releases will be sent to journalists under embargo one week before publication. Authors may choose to send out their own release about the paper, though they should acknowledge Public Health Research & Practice as the source and notify the journal Editor to enable coordination of media activity. As part of our promotional strategy for articles, we may send embargoed copies of articles to key staff of organisations that are directly impacted. The authors will be informed if this occurs.
Errors of fact will be corrected, though if an error is serious, Public Health Research & Practice will consider whether retraction is warranted. Authors should notify the journal if they become aware of an error that needs to be corrected. Before corrections resulting from author error can be published, a signed statement from all authors (scanned and sent via email) is required. The journal will notify the corresponding author of any journal-initiated errors and will correct the record. A new version of the corrected article will be posted to the website and the previous versions will be archived, with a note that a more recent version is available. Corrections to Online Early articles will appear as a note in the article stating the corrected version will appear in the next quarterly issue.
Reader disagreement with a published manuscript will be handled as a letter to the editor unless there is a clear error of fact in the paper that warrants a correction or retraction.
Retractions will be considered if: evidence comes to light showing research findings are invalid or unreliable; it becomes apparent the findings have been published elsewhere; a case of plagiarism occurs; the research is subsequently revealed as unethical. Retraction notices will be clearly identified and linked to the article. Public Health Research & Practice adheres to Retraction Guidelines issued by the Committee of Publication Ethics (COPE). The journal uses the CrossCheck system to screen for plagiarism. See Journal information for more detail.
All final decisions on manuscripts, including the decision to publish, are made by the Editor-in-Chief.
Authors who wish to appeal a publication rejection should send a detailed letter outlining the reasons for their appeal and the arguments for reconsideration by the Public Health Research & Practice editorial team. The written appeal should address all comments made by peer reviewers on the original manuscript. This will be considered and, if appropriate, an invitation to resubmit may be offered. If resubmission occurs, the second manuscript will also undergo peer review.
Readers who wish to make a complaint of another nature should do so by phone or in writing to the journal’s Editor. If the complaint cannot be satisfactorily resolved by the Editor it may be escalated to the Editor-in-Chief. The journal will attempt to resolve complaints in a timely manner, responding within one week to the initial complaint and addressing the nature of the complaint within three weeks.
Allegations of possible misconduct (including plagiarism, self-plagiarism and falsification of data) will be investigated by a committee comprising members of the Editorial Board and the in-house editorial team. Depending on the outcome, the journal may retract a published paper, reject a submitted paper, or publish an expression of concern and notify the author’s institution. Public Health Research & Practice will observe the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors issued by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in relation to suspected cases of research misconduct. For more information on how we screen for plagiarism, please see our Journal information page in the About us section.
Public Health Research & Practice is an open access journal that makes its content freely accessible to users.
The journal operates under a Creative Commons License Deed – Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This allows non-commercial users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material. This is done on the condition that appropriate credit is given to the journal, a link to the license is provided, and an indication given if changes to the article were made. Any reuse should not suggest Public Health Research & Practice endorses the individual/organisation reusing the material or the actual reuse of the material. Those who reuse the work must licence their derivative works on the same terms. This Licence is denoted by the following symbol:
Commercial users must seek permission from the Editor to re-use Public Health Research & Practice material. Permission must be sought via email. Our default position is not to grant reproduction or adaptation permission for commercial use however, there may be occasions where commercial use is appropriate and we will consider each application on its merits.
Authors submitting manuscripts to the journal will be asked to sign a Licence to Publish form. This confers on us, a licence to publish the work for any purpose and make content freely accessible to users under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, and allows authors to use their own articles for non-commercial purposes without seeking permission from us.
Any material covered by copyright restrictions that forms part of the submitted work (for example, tables, graphs and images) must be identified and attributed. Appropriate copyright permissions must be obtained by the authors.
We welcome other websites linking to our material under the following conditions:
Where we link to other websites, we do not endorse or take responsibility for the content on linked sites or their availability.